Corrupt bargain

Historic Document Assignment #2

Question 1

Henry clay was the speaker of the home of Reps. Although Mr. Clay preferred to operate for that much coveted position from the leader of U . s . States he couldn’t achieve this while he wasn’t one of the three selected in the condition of Kentucky to stay in home of Representative. Even though Mr. Clay wasn’t selected to be among the electors from the leader in the condition House of Representative, he’d other alternative route of impacting on the voting in the home of Reps. Mr. Letcher a bosom friend of Clay whom they can lodged within the same house was part of house of associated with Kentucky. Being of these great influence in the home, he might have used his energy because the speaker of the home of Reps to help the voting in the home within the favor of John Quincy Adams.

After Clay skipped an chance to become chosen for in the home of Representative, it had been apparent that his competitors will take advantage of the situation to pin him lower particularly in their own condition of Kentucky. Based on Letcher, there’d be conferences of individuals in the county level instructing their people to election for Jackson. Even Relief Party is going to be adopted into this hostility against Mr. Clay. Letcher states that Relief Party was hostile to Henry Clay. Jackson standing on the competitors&rsquo side it’s apparent that Clay Henry could not be in the support for presidency.

Within the conversation between Letcher and Adams around the 17th at Adams&rsquo office represents that Adams had not had bitter feelings about Clay which even Clay themself was conscious of despite getting fallen out before. In those days Clay didn’t feel any hostility against Adams as well as spoke professionally of him as confirmed by Letcher. Based on Letcher Clay would be a sincere guy &ldquoand would be a guy of truthfulness&rdquo (2) and most likely would not participate in corrupt deals. The voting of Calhoun because the vice-leader by electors of Kentucky was more hostile to Clay compared to election of Jackson because the leader. It is because the election of Calhoun because the vice-leader reduced Clay&rsquos prospects of rising to the peak getting had lost a chance to become one of the presidential candidates. This could make Clay play his cards smartly to be able to be compensated by having an administration portfolio. He needed to marshal and set his support within the right &ldquobasket&rdquo. Even though Jackson had emerged top Clay couldn’t put his support behind Jackson for that simple reason to be based on Reality Party which was hostile to him. However, it couldn’t be smart for Clay to aid William Harris Crawford since he was the poorest from the candidates. Although Clay and Adams had fallen out before, Adams didn’t show hostility to Clay. This really is was unusual also it managed to get Clay change his perception about Adams. Through this uncommon behavior Adams commanded great respect from Clay. Clay would be a very influential in Kentucky and the supports would cast their support behind Adams when they were assured that Clay is going to be compensated by having an administration portfolio. If Adams didn’t harbor any hostility against Clay despite false accusations, then Clay was almost certain to be compensated heftily if he put his support behind Adams.

The bottom line is, there’s no evidence through the conversations between Clay and Adams within the memoir that there is corrupt bargain for presidency. Clay&rsquos support of Adams was purely from his foreseen gain. To Clay, Adams was a genuine, compassionate and reliable person. He was therefore almost certain to get a reward if John Quincy Adams grew to become the leader of U . s . States. Just like he expected, Adams compensated him with effective secretary of condition portfolio.

Memoirs are autobiographies that lots of sometimes are subjective. The memoirs only tell the storyline in the author&rsquos perspective and therefore many sometimes couldn’t present the individuals weakness. Memoirs are thus hard to rely on to make a goal judgment about something as well as in this situation whether Henry Clay and Quincy Adams were involved in a corrupt bargain for presidency.

Question 2

Accusation of the &ldquocorrupt bargain&rdquo will clearly affect Adam&rsquos presidency. Such accusations will slump the belief that individuals of U . s . States in addition from the people of House of Representative have in Adams&rsquos. Consequently he’d meet lots of resistance in passing of bills at home of Reps in addition to support of those of U . s . States generally. With no support of the home of Reps it will likely be very difficult for Adams to apply his campaign promises. Whenever he may wish to do anything whatsoever, you will see a sense that something fishy might be happening. Around the submit the perspective the accusations of corruption are false, it’ll make his supporters to possess more belief in him and therefore enjoy their ardent support whatsoever time. He might also win the support of his competitors from sympathy.

If Adam&rsquos family background isn’t credible it might seriously aggravate the issue. If his family members have past being involved with corrupt deals mainly in the political arena, then this is utilized by his competitors as an approach to justify Adam&rsquos accusations of corruption. Although it’s possible that Adam&rsquos isn’t corrupt it might be hard to convince people otherwise.